← The simple act of voting

Nepal · Devithan Community ForestTerritory · Natura

When a community can take care of the forest

Management rights and shared responsibilities can give residents a concrete reason to tend to the forest over time.

What the evidence tells us ↓
Nepal · Devithan Community Forest. The forest thins out near the village / The community manages and oversees regrowth
The forest thins out near the villageThe community manages and oversees regrowth
A mechanism, not a numerical forecast

How the change works

  1. 01 / Public decision

    Shared rights and rules

  2. 02 / Physical change

    Local care and surveillance

  3. 03 / Possible outcome

    Regrown to measure

Management rights and shared responsibilities can give residents a concrete reason to tend to the forest over time.

Research and local documents ↓
Documented case

What the evidence tells us

Satellite observations reported by NASA show that forest cover in Devithan increased from 12% in 1988 to 92% in 2016. Community management is part of the Nepalese regrowth story.

Documented case · 1988 and 2016 · Devithan's site

Forest cover in Devithan

198812 % of surface
201692 % of surface

12 % of surface1988

92 % of surface2016

Satellite comparison referring to a single site. It is not a national percentage nor is it an isolated causal effect.

Open the source ↗
Read values and method
1988 and 2016 · Devithan's site
IndicatorValue
198812 % of surface
201692 % of surface

Satellite comparison referring to a single site. It is not a national percentage nor is it an isolated causal effect.

Qualitative comparison

Putting the choices into practice

Responsibility

The challengeAccess without shared rules

The responseCommunity management

Oversight

The challengePoorly supervised forest

The responseLocal surveillance

Outcome

The challengeForest cover in 1988

The responseForest cover in 2016

The diagram compares choices and conditions for putting them into practice. Measured outcomes and their limits are discussed in the evidence.

Research and local documents ↓
Conditions and limits

The comparison describes a site and two dates. It doesn't prove that every community forest achieves the same result or that change depends on a single factor.

Other possible benefits

More stable access to forest resources and involvement of the people who inhabit the territory.

Research and local documents

  1. Local document and reported findingNASA Earth Observatory · How Nepal Regenerated Its Forests ↗

    Research on the case, mechanism, or measures discussed in the sheet.

  2. Evidence for this findingVan Den Hoek et al., 2021 · Forest cover change in Nepal ↗

    Satellite research on the change in forest cover; Devithan's data remains a local case.

  3. Local project or policy documentForestAction · Community Forest Policy in Nepal ↗

    Community Management Framework and the Forest Act of 1993.

Evidence reviewed:

Share a possibility.

Instagram and TikTok: save the image or use your device’s sharing menu.