← The simple act of voting

Bhutan · Himalayan landscapeTerritory · Natura

Protecting the forest also in the Constitution

Writing a minimum forest threshold in the Constitution makes its conservation a commitment that exceeds the individual government program.

What the evidence tells us ↓
Bhutan · Himalayan landscape. The forest is considered available land. / Forest protection becomes a lasting obligation
The forest is considered available land.Forest protection becomes a lasting obligation
A mechanism, not a numerical forecast

How the change works

  1. 01 / Public decision

    Constitutional obligation

  2. 02 / Physical change

    Forest cover to maintain

  3. 03 / Possible outcome

    Protection beyond the political mandate

Writing a minimum forest threshold in the Constitution makes its conservation a commitment that exceeds the individual government program.

Research and local documents ↓
Documented rules and objectives

What the evidence tells us

Article 5.3 of the Constitution of Bhutan requires keeping at least 60% of the territory under forest cover. The 2015 national inventory accounts separately for emissions and removals.

Documented rules and objectives · Constitution of 2008 · Article 5.3

A threshold written in the Constitution

A threshold written in the Constitution. Minimum forest cover required: 60 % of the territory; Remaining share of the territory: 40 % of the territory

60 % of the territoryMinimum forest cover required

40 % of the territoryRemaining share of the territory

It is a legal threshold, not the observed coverage and not a cut in emissions.

Open the source ↗
Read values and method
Constitution of 2008 · Article 5.3
IndicatorValue
Minimum forest cover required60 % of the territory
Remaining share of the territory40 % of the territory

It is a legal threshold, not the observed coverage and not a cut in emissions.

Qualitative comparison

Putting the choices into practice

Rule

The challengeReversible protection without threshold

The responseConstitutional minimum

Indicator

The challengeSurface without definition

The responseMeasured forest cover

Climate

The challengeConfusing trees and emissions

The responseSeparate carbon inventory

The diagram compares choices and conditions for putting them into practice. Measured outcomes and their limits are discussed in the evidence.

Research and local documents ↓
Conditions and limits

60% is a legal threshold, not a cut in emissions. Forest quality, biodiversity and management remain to be verified even when the surface complies with the standard.

Other possible benefits

Continuity of protection of Himalayan landscapes and habitats.

Research and local documents

  1. Local project or policy documentBhutan · Second Nationally Determined Contribution ↗

    Institutional documentation of the program, territory or rules mentioned.

  2. Local project or policy documentConstitution of Bhutan, 2008 · Article 5.3 ↗

    Institutional documentation of the program, territory or rules mentioned.

Evidence reviewed:

Share a possibility.

Instagram and TikTok: save the image or use your device’s sharing menu.