← The simple act of voting

Uganda · Hoima and KibaaleTerritory · Natura

Paying for conservation where it can make a difference

Paying to maintain the forest can change the economic incentive to cut, if the contract is credible and compliance is verified.

What the evidence tells us ↓
Uganda · Hoima and Kibaale. Cutting the forest is an immediate source of income / A payment recognizes the value of keeping it
Cutting the forest is an immediate source of incomeA payment recognizes the value of keeping it
A mechanism, not a numerical forecast

How the change works

  1. 01 / Public decision

    Contracts and payments

  2. 02 / Physical change

    Verified storage

  3. 03 / Possible outcome

    Less loss of trees over the period

Paying to maintain the forest can change the economic incentive to cut, if the contract is credible and compliance is verified.

Research and local documents ↓
Randomized experiment

What the evidence tells us

In an experiment in 121 villages in Uganda, the loss of tree cover over two years was 4.2% in villages with the program and 9.1% in those under control.

Randomized experiment · Two-year experiment · 121 villages

The loss of trees in the two groups

Villages of control9.1 % of tree cover lost
Villages with the program4.2 % of tree cover lost

9.1 % of tree cover lostVillages of control

4.2 % of tree cover lostVillages with the program

60 villages with the program and 61 under control. The duration of the result after payments requires other checks.

Open the source ↗
Read values and method
Two-year experiment · 121 villages
IndicatorValue
Villages of control9.1 % of tree cover lost
Villages with the program4.2 % of tree cover lost

60 villages with the program and 61 under control. The duration of the result after payments requires other checks.

Qualitative comparison

Putting the choices into practice

Incentive

The challengeIncome from logging

The responsePayment for conservation

Oversight

The challengeUnverified promise

The responseObserved tree cover

Duration

The challengeEnd of contract only

The responseSubsequent monitoring

The diagram compares choices and conditions for putting them into practice. Measured outcomes and their limits are discussed in the evidence.

Research and local documents ↓
Conditions and limits

The result concerns that program and that period. The duration of storage after payments and the possible movement of the cut require further verification.

Other possible benefits

Get in for the owners involved without having to give up trees.

Research and local documents

  1. Local document and reported findingJayachandran et al., 2017 · Cash for carbon ↗

    Research on the case, mechanism, or measures discussed in the sheet.

  2. Local project or policy documentJ-PAL · Payments for ecosystem services in Uganda ↗

    Institutional documentation of the program, territory or rules mentioned.

Evidence reviewed:

Share a possibility.

Instagram and TikTok: save the image or use your device’s sharing menu.